HOWARD
PHILIPS LOVECRAFTS INTRODUCTION
FROM
The oldest and strongest emotion of mankind is fear, and the oldest and
strongest kind of fear is fear of the unknown.
These facts few psychologists will dispute, and their admitted truth must
establish for all time the genuineness and dignity of the weirdly horrible tales
as a literary form. Against it are
discharged all the shafts of a materialistic sophistication which clings to
frequently felt
emotions and external events, and of a naively inspired idealism
which deprecates the aesthetic motive and calls for a didactic literature to
uplift the reader toward a suitable degree of smirking optimism.
But in spite of all this opposition the weird tale has survived,
developed, and attained remarkable heights of perfection; founded as it is on a
profound and elementary principle whose appeal, if not always universal, must
necessarily be poignant and permanent to minds of the requisite sensitiveness.
The appeal of the spectrally macabre is generally narrow because it
demands from the reader a certain degree of imagination and a capacity for
detachment from everyday life. Relatively
few are free enough from the spell of the daily routine to respond to rappings
from outside, and tales of ordinary feelings and events, or of common
sentimental distortions of such feelings and events, will always take first
place in the taste of the majority; rightly, perhaps, since of course these
ordinary matters make up the greater part of human experience.
But the sensitive are always with us, and sometimes a curious streak of
fancy invades an obscure corner of the very hardest head; so that no amount of
rationalisation [sic], reform, or Freudian analysis can quite annul the thrill
of the chimney-corner whisper or the lonely wood. There is here involved a psychological pattern or tradition
as real and as deeply grounded in mental experience as any other pattern or
tradition of mankind; coeval with the religious feeling and closely related to
many aspects of it, and too much a part of our innermost biological heritage to
lose keen potency over a very important, though not numerically great, minority
of our species.
Mans first instincts and emotions formed his response to the
environment in which he found himself. Definite
feelings based on pleasure and pain grew up around the phenomena whose causes
and effects he understood, whilst around those which he did not understandand
the universe teemed with them in the early dayswere naturally woven such
personifications, marvelous interpretations, and sensations of awe and fear as
would be hit upon by a race having few and simple ideas and limited experience.
The unknown, being likewise the unpredictable, became for our primitive
forefathers a terrible and omnipotent source of boons and calamities visited
upon mankind for cryptic and wholly extraterrestrial reasons, and thus clearly
belonging to spheres of existence whereof we know nothing and wherein we have no
part. The phenomenon of dreaming likewise helped to build up the
notion of an unreal or spiritual world; and in general, all the conditions of
savage dawn-life so strongly conducted toward a feeling of the supernatural,
that we need not wonder at the thoroughness with which mans very hereditary
essence has become saturated with religion and superstition. That saturation must, as a matter of plain scientific fact,
be regarded as virtually permanent so far as the subconscious mind and inner
instincts are concerned; for though the area of the unknown has been steadily
contracting for thousands of years, an infinite reservoir of mystery still
engulfs most of the outer cosmos, whilst a vast residuum of powerful inherited
associations clings round all the objects and processes that were once
mysterious, however well they may now be explained.
And more than this, there is an actual physiological fixation of the old
instincts in our nervous tissue, which would make them obscurely operative even
were the conscious mind to be purged of all sources of wonder.
Because we remember pain and the menace of death more vividly than
pleasure, and because our feelings toward the beneficent aspects of the unknown
have from the first been captured and formalised [sic] by conventional religious
rituals, it as fallen to the lot of the darker and more maleficent side of
cosmic mystery to figure chiefly in our popular supernatural folklore.
This tendency, too, is naturally enhanced by the fact that uncertainty
and danger are always closely allied; thus making any kind of an unknown world a
world of peril and evil possibilities. When
to this sense of fear and evil the inevitable fascination of wonder and
curiosity are superadded, there is born a composite body of keen emotion and
imaginative provocation whose vitality must of necessity endure as long as the
human race itself. Children will always be afraid of the dark, and men with
minds sensitive to hereditary impulse will always tremble at the thought of the
hidden and fathomless worlds of strange life which may pulsate in the gulfs
beyond the stars, or press hideously upon our own globe in unholy dimensions
which only the dead and the moonstruck can glimpse.
With this foundation, no one need wonder at the existence of a literature
of cosmic fear. It has always
existed, and always will exist; and no better evidence of its tenacious vigour
can be cited than the impulse which now and then drives writers of totally
opposite leanings to try their hands at it in isolated tales, as if to discharge
from their minds certain phantasmal shapes which would otherwise haunt them. Thus Dickens wrote several eerie narratives; Browning, the
hideous poem Childe Roland; Henry James, The Turn of the Screw;
Dr. Holmes, the subtle novel Elsie Venner; F. Marion Crawford, The
Upper Berth and a number of other examples; Mrs. Charlotte Perkins Gilman,
social worker, The Yellow Wall Paper; whilst the humorist, W. W. Jacobs,
produced that able melodramatic bit called The Monkeys Paw.
This type of fear-literature must not be confounded with a type
externally similar but psychologically widely different; the literature of mere
physical fear and the mundanely gruesome. Such
writing, to be sure, has its place, as has the conventional or even whimsical or
humorous ghost story where formalism or the authors knowing wink removes the
true sense of the morbidly unnatural; but these things are not the literature of
cosmic fear in its purest sense. The
true weird tale has something more than secret murder, bloody bones, or a
sheeted form clanking chains according to the rule. A certain atmosphere of breathless and unexplainable dread of
outer, unknown forces must be present; and there must be a hint, expressed with
a seriousness and portentousness becoming its subject, of that most terrible
conception of the human braina malign and particular suspension or defeat of
those fixed laws of Nature which are our only safeguard against the assaults of
chaos and the daemons of unplumbed space.
Naturally we cannot expect all weird tales to conform absolutely to any
theoretical model. Creative minds
are uneven, and the best of fabrics have their dull spots.
Moreover, much of the choices weird work is unconscious; appearing in
memorable fragments scattered through material whose massed effect may be of a
very different cast. Atmosphere is
the all-important thing, for the final criterion of authenticity is not the
dovetailing of a plot but the creation of a given sensation.
We may say, as a general thing, that a weird story whose intent is to
teach or produce a social effect, or one in which the horrors are finally
explained away by natural means, is not a genuine tale of cosmic fear; but it
remains a fact that such narratives often possess, in isolated sections,
atmospheric touches which fulfill every condition of true supernatural
horror-literature. Therefore we must judge a weird tale not by the authors
intent, or by the mere mechanics of the plot; but by the emotional level which
it attains at its least mundane point. If the proper sensations are excited, such a high spot
must be admitted on its own merits as weird literature, no matter how
prosaically it is later dragged down. The
one test of the really weird is simply thiswhether or not there be excited in
the reader a profound sense of dread, and of contact with unknown spheres and
powers; a subtle attitude of awed listening, as if for the beating of black
wings or the scratching of outside shapes and entities on the known universes
utmost rim. And of course, the more
completely and unifiedly a story conveys this atmosphere, the better it is as a
work of art in the given medium (12-16).
LOVECRAFT: "THE WEIRD TRADITION IN AMERICA"
LOVECRAFT: "THE
MODERN MASTERS"